The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from
1983 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The given pie charts depict data regarding the percentage of energy generated from five
different sources (Hydropower, Oil, Nuclear power, Coal, Natural Gas) in a particular country
between 1983 and 2003.
In general, it is clear that oil was the most popular source of energy in both years despite a slight
decrease. In addition, this country also relied more on using nuclear power and natural gas by
2003.
To begin with, in 1983, oil and coal were used to produce 42% and 23% of the total energy,
respectively. Over the next 20 years, the proportion of energy produced from oil saw a slight
decline by 4%, while energy from coal also reduced by 10%.
In contrast, there was a reverse pattern in both figures for nuclear power and natural gas, which
increased by 4% and 10% respectively to collectively surpass the percentage of energy
generated from coal. On the other hand, hydropower was responsible for only 4% of energy
produced in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasingly the number of sport facilities Other however say that this would have little effect on public health Discuss both of view and give your own opinions 84
- Some people believe the aims of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe are much wider benefit of university education for both individuals and society. 73
- I m gonna tell you a time that I was very exhausted but I had to stay awake It was such a significant test because it helped me to graduate the high school n take a place in the university I spent a lot of time for this exam s preparation but I was still 56
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female student in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in general, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95705521472 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55624376277 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3368324426 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5714285714 5.23603664747 278% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189119644843 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903072900959 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540574291733 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750626617025 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504677929584 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.