The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from
1983 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The percentages of power generated in a nation by five various sources: hydropower, oil, nuclear power, coal, natural gas, were given by two pie charts, namely 1983 and 2003.At first glance, it is clear that there was an unfair distribution for electricity production in both 1983 and 2003, especially from oil. However, in the duration of two decades, noticeable was that except for oil and hydropower, the rest of producing methods rose significantly.In 1983, oil was the dominant with nearly half of the total at 42%. In close places were coal and nuclear power, capturing nearly a quarter at 23% and 20%. The remaining 15% of power was produced by using hydro power and natural gas, with the figures being 11% and 4% respectively.Twenty years later, in 2003, both nuclear power and natural gas had a positive trend to reach almost one-four of the total. Conversely, even though the first place of power production was still oil, there was a slight fall by 5% to 38%. Similarly, power from coal witnessed a dramatic drop with the proportion being 13%. Surprisingly, hydro power was still remaining in the time given.In summary, it seemed that nuclear power and natural gas gradually replaced the dominant of oil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | lee giang | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-31 | lee giang | 11 | view |
- The use of social media is replaced face to face interaction among people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many people nowsadays travel abroad for their university education. Why do people do this and would/ will you consider doing this yourself?Give the reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. 56
- Describe a time you were sleepy but had to stay awake You should say When it was Why you had to stay awake How you kept yourself awake And explain how you felt about it 56
- The graph show the annual income of language related jobs in US dollars in five cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...by two pie charts, namely 1983 and 2003.At first glance, it is clear that there wa...
^^
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...of producing methods rose significantly.In 1983, oil was the dominant with nearly ...
^^
Line 1, column 735, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Twenty
...e figures being 11% and 4% respectively.Twenty years later, in 2003, both nuclear powe...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 929, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'oiled'.
Suggestion: oiled
...rst place of power production was still oil, there was a slight fall by 5% to 38%. ...
^^^
Line 1, column 1120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...r was still remaining in the time given.In summary, it seemed that nuclear power a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, similarly, so, still, except for, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96078431373 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79502909111 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4269220841 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0710611355123 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366088132156 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383192603036 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710611355123 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.