The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India.
Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
The three pie charts compare the consumption of various food types in 2008 among China, India and the global figures.
As shown from the information provided, processed food was in the dominant position of food consumption in 2008, whereby 41%, 34% and 39% were registered by the world, China and India respectively. Meanwhile, vegetables and fruits accounted for approximately one-third in both global consumption and the Chinese intake, whereas their Indian counterparts took less than one-fourth in their daily meals.
In stark contrast, food derived from animal, however, shared a significantly different pattern in China. In fact, in comparison to India, which was practically in line with the world consumption at 26%, the Chinese dining habit merely consumed 15% meat at large. Likewise, the Chinese also consumed a considerable amount of nuts and seed at 19%, exceeding the percentage found in India and global culture, which were registered at 11% and 4% respectively.
Overall, India shared some resemblance with the world's figure in terms of food consumption pattern in 2008
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | sandeep kumari | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 96
- In many parts of the world, there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 84
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 67
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, third, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47647058824 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92620306197 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1884667828 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251353691004 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131095549927 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105115187123 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188534242897 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891066529683 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.