International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both views and then give your opinion.
Over the past decades, an exponential growth of global trade has been seen over the globe as a result of globalisation. While some commentators perceive this change as an infringement to their home countries, some cling to the notion that this collaboration is a benefit to all nations. This essay is set to explore both positions.
First of all, the promotion of commodity manufactured overseas tends to hinder the growth of indigenous production. This repercussion is probably brought with the fact that exotic products are likely to be incredibly tempting in terms of quality assurance. Research from Hong Kong University showed that citizens prefer to pick beef produced in Australia and Japan rather than those coming from their home country, even though the local products are marked at a lower price. Consequently, the import weaken the competitiveness of produces derived from local firm.
However, this flow of goods, meanwhile, is an archetype of information exchange that our life enrichment counts on. Having been placed numerous import products on the selves, a local supermarket can then be translated into a channel delivering new ideology and cultural message from foreign countries, as well as larvishing opportunities for language acquisition, which in turn extends our horizon. In fact, shopping in these international stores is a more affordable mean in comparison to travelling abroad that requires an enormous budget paying for accommodation.
In conclusion, evident is the fact that the spate of international marketing is endowed with both detriments and advantages. In the future, some actions are expected to be undertaken by the government to protect local industries, thus alleviate the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-26 | vinisj | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 78
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 77
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 89
- In many parts of the world, there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed with both detriments and advantages. In the future, some actions are expected t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48134328358 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12766482503 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6805736358 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082775131912 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288044337732 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302404260135 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498858963597 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294375573992 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.