It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician.
Discuss the two ideas giving your opinion.
The recent centuries have seen numerous musical and sport achievement. Some laud the talent that the eminent is endowed with; however, in this essay, I would argue that the dedication entailing painstaking preparation and assiduous training pave the way for their success, thus any children have the chance to acquire a world-renowned accomplishment. I will enumerate both positions as follows.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the genes inherited from parents manipulates all of us to resemble our ancestors on some traits entailing facial appearance, temperation, body composition as well as bents. Despite the possibility of genetic mutation - a process occasionally altering parts of our genetic codes that constitute our organic inheritance - most of us are manifesting in the way we were born. Having grown up learning the fundermental knowledge, a gifted one is likely to shine on the stage he belonged and grow to gain his reputation.
Further and more importantly, though, I intend to argue that nurturing has a vitally important role to play. An athlete reaping the benefits in championship devotes a vast amount of time in his training ranging from physical to mental, whereas continuous practices are responsible for meeting with applauds in concert hall. Immersing oneself without worrying his livelihood are merely underpinned by either affluent families or countries. I believe that one growing up with such benefits nowadays tends to be the ultimate winner of the realm he obsessed.
By way of conclusion, I would contend that nurture outweighs nature in modern era of materialism and thus people can be taught to be excelled in whatever sovereignty.
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Some people believe that employment over the age of 60 is not right and creates lots of problems. So people should retire after 60 and not work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- People equate a good salary with success Some say that money is not what will make you successful In your own opinion what will make a person truly successful Give specific reasons and examples to support you answer 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34586466165 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09049844909 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68045112782 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4824740027 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128141185041 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395513619167 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400214779129 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747697898432 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386189663088 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.