The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009
The pie charts illustrate the produce of electricity from conventional thermal nuclear and renewables sources in Germany and France in 2009. At first glance, it is evident that in Germany the large amount of electricity generated from conventional thermal source, while in France the most popular source which was used to produce electricity was nuclear.
In 2009, Germany generated 560 billion kWh, while France only produced 510 billion kWh. There was approximately 60 percent of the amount of electricity generated by conventional thermal source and the figure for nuclear was only 23 percent in Germany. By contrast, most electricity produced in France from nuclear source, at 76 percent, while conventional thermal only generated nearly 11 percent of electricity
The amount of renewables sources which was used to produce electricity in both Germany and France was the same, at around 18 percent and 14 percent respectively. The electricity generated from biomass and wind accounted for nearly 80 percent in Germany and the rest of the electricity produced from hydroelectric and solar. Whereas hydroelectric source produced 80,5 percent of the electricity in France, the figure for wind and biomass only occupied ai just under 20 percent. Geothermal source which was not used in both Germany and France
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | susanti | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | thy thanh | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | rahulchd | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | dhillonsukh | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory.Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 56
- The chart shows the percentage of people who have moved house either in the last 3 years between 3 to 5 years or not within the last 5 years 74
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to produce electricity was nuclear. In 2009, Germany generated 560 billion k...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rated nearly 11 percent of electricity The amount of renewables sources which w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43902439024 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91699975436 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409756097561 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6490525651 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.285714286 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348166596849 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227911811061 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12408374945 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287959086247 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877773331358 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.