The pie diagrams show the extent of Australian optional school graduates who were jobless, utilized or seeking after further training, in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed, employed or pursuing further education, in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, the percentage of students in Australia to go to work grew, while there was a decline in both the rate of those continuing higher levels of study and those who were jobless.
In 1980, half of the Australian secondary school-leavers chose to continue their learning, the sum of the learners decided to move on work at 40%. However, while the number of students wanted to advance academic levels decreased to 37%, the opposite was true for those who seek a job, this number increased to 55% in 2000, which was the largest figure among all examined categories.
On the other hand, regarding the proportion of unemployed in Australia, the number of students after finishing secondary school without a career rose slightly to 12% in 1990 before falling down 8% in the final year of the exam.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 73
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0248447205 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73105526495 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.5334620332 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.8 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253621878245 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136598106408 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118828893093 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159130123212 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124425415397 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.