Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005. Plan B shows the same area in the present day.
The pictures illustrate some changes which have been taken on the first floor of an art gallery from 2005 to the present.
Overall, while there are some features that have been renovated and converted on the left-hand side of the building, the right-hand side has been still unchanging. In addition, a number of new facilities have been added to the building in general.
In 2005, the front desk was located slightly to the left that has been moved to in the centre of the entrance hall. There was a café and shop in the rear-left corner of the building that have been replaced by a gallery shop. The gallery office in front of it has been removed and the area is now occupied by three vending machines.
Exhibition room 4 has been divided into two separate spaces, one has been used as a temporary collection while the other serves as a children’s area (interactive). The stairway to the upper floor has been narrowed down to generate a slot for a lift next to exhibition room 3. Outside the building, a wheelchairs ramp has been built in the entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-17 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-23 | Anna Forster | view | |
| 2022-02-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 85
- Some people think that museums and art galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three di erent cites 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67021276596 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5653963608 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1412058183 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849975217068 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411791445072 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506372086039 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678766422383 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063522141589 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67021276596 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5653963608 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1412058183 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849975217068 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411791445072 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506372086039 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678766422383 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063522141589 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.