The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university.
The given diagrams illustrate the layout of two different student rooms at an Australian university.
Overall, the main differences between the two rooms are the price, the size, the features of each room, and how many people each room can accommodate. As can be seen, the first room is the larger, more expensive one, and has more features as well as can accommodate a greater number of people.
The first room is suitable for two people and costs $350 per week, while the second room is only suitable for one person and costs $200 per week. The first room is also significantly larger, at 6m x 4m, compared with the second room, which is only 6m x 2.5m.
The first room contains two beds, two study desks, two televisions, two cupboards, a bookshelf, and a table and chairs. Meanwhile, the second room only features one bed, one study desk, and one television, but has no cupboards, bookshelf, or table and chairs. Both rooms have similar kitchen and bathroom facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 56
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...econd room, which is only 6m x 2.5m. The first room contains two beds, two study...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 33.7804878049 21% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80473372781 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64577116137 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0879592787 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405740869199 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170423913455 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795458316684 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241449687277 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560515323391 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.