The process of Pu erh Raw Tea and Ripe Tea

Essay topics:

The process of Pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe Tea

The diagram shows the manufacturing process of two types of tea, it called pu-erh Raw Tea and Ripe Tea. Both the teas have a few same process in the first three stages. It can be seen that the methods of production differ in the final parts, which accounts for the resulting variations in the two teas.
First, the tea puts on pan fried in order to inactivate the enzymes. Following this, rolling the tea and thereafter spread out on around mat for drying under the sun. For the next step the loose raw tea is ready to be behind into either ripe tea or raw tea. This is where the process divides. For making pu-erh ripe tea, fermentation the loose tea which left to mold. After completing the fermentation step, the producing the ripe tea is compressed and the tea is ready for consumting. Regarding about the other process, the pu-erh Raw Tea ready for distribution as vintage Raw Tea , the loose tea is through of compress process again and then left to age by storage.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-21 nobitaa 73 view
2024-12-20 khanhkhanhlhp 78 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran view
Essays by user mahya25 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eady for distribution as vintage Raw Tea , the loose tea is through of compress pr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42190415033 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0600819252 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.687149424088 0.215688989381 319% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.303356682751 0.103423049105 293% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222277011697 0.0843802449381 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.575829055057 0.15604864568 369% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643961475795 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eady for distribution as vintage Raw Tea , the loose tea is through of compress pr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42190415033 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0600819252 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.687149424088 0.215688989381 319% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.303356682751 0.103423049105 293% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.222277011697 0.0843802449381 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.575829055057 0.15604864568 369% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643961475795 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.