The process of pu-reh ripe tea and ripe tea.
The diagram below shows how the pu-erh ripe tea and the raw tea are made.
It is clear that there are five stages in this process, from the initial and common step of pan-frying the pu-erh grass to the eventual production of the pu-erh ripe tea and raw tea.
At the first common step of producing Pu-erh’s teas, the Pu-erh grass is collected and pan frying it, and this step is done to inactivate her enzymes. Then we roll this grass and let it dry under the sun, and we can see that their color started to change into a darker one. Next, we can see that the raw tea has been loosened.
In stages four and five of the process, the two different types of Pu-erh’s teas will be created. To make the pu-erh raw tea, the raw tea has to be compressed. And finally, it has to be aged by storage to become, at the end, a vintage pu-erh raw tea. On the other hand, to make a pu-erh ripe tea, the loose raw tea has to be fermented by mold to become a loose ripe tea. Following this, the loose ripe tea is compressed to be done with a Pru-erh ripe tea.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wor
- The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What s your opinion 56
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, then, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12195121951 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10601811818 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8180370447 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477383015443 0.215688989381 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.254928685177 0.103423049105 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161971971452 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351487884237 0.15604864568 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158597074482 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.62 11.4140731707 58% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.