The proporation of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diet
The proporation of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diet
The pie chart given below illustrate the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. Overall, it can be seen that the greatest proporation for entirely is carbohydrates. By contrast, those proporation for fat. It is measured in precentage.
Regarding to the data, the highest percentage of those is carbohydrates portion. Especially is 60% in healthy diet for sport. Suprisingly, proportion of protein minimally for those and two different diet others which is 25%. And there is 5% contradiction proporation fat in healthy diet and healthy diet for sport.
In average diet, a similiar amount of carbohydrates and protein proporation that is 40%. One fifth other is porporation of fat. But that more considerable from proporation fat in healthy diet fot sport. In contrast from carbohydrates and protein proporation in two diet others, carbohydrates in average diet is minimal.
- The differences in wheat exports over three different area 73
- Online sales for retail sectors in Canada 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 56
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- Many university students live with their families while other live away from because their universities are in different places 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ation fat in healthy diet fot sport. In contrast from carbohydrates and protein proporat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38636258005 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480263157895 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6522475051 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6666666667 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6666666667 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.602775257556 0.215688989381 279% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207245862017 0.103423049105 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189052796304 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.509981336045 0.15604864568 327% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288569930696 0.0819641961636 352% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 10.3012195122 89% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.73 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.