Road access to a city hospital
The picture describe the transformation to road leading to a City Hospital from 2007 to 2010.
Looking at the maps, it can be immediately seen that the entrance to City Hospital had undergone sinificant change during the period. The most noticeable change that the road witnessed is the apperance of two roundabouts and the seperation of car parking.
First of all, while Ring Road and City Road remained unchanged in both shape and location, Hospital Road had been added with 2 roundabouts in ends. Bus stops located across Hospital Road has been unified and enlarged into a big bus station in the West.
In addition, in 2007, car park for both staff and public were in same position in the East of Hospital Road. This was changed in next three years. While total area of old car parking was converted into staff car park, public car park was removed to the East of City Hospital.
- the plan below show the layout of a university s sport centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sport center now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals others say that there are more important environment problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Road access to a city hospital 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'describes'.
Suggestion: describes
The picture describe the transformation to road leading to a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 730.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47597404077 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6047365912 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355110655275 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159060561335 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116936876789 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241803226301 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986808694392 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.