Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious
pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable that air travel causes pollution and uses a lot of fuel, bit I disagree that air
travel should be restricted. Restricting air travel would solve some problems but would lead
to many other problems.
At a time when people all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil fuels and
global warming, it is right to take action to save the planet earth. However, to simply
discourage flights is not the answer. International tourism has become the backbone of
many economies of the world. Many countries are earning from tourism. Many people are
employed in this industry. Many businesses like hotels and leisure centres are dependent on
tourists. So, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new and even worse
problems. Many businesses would go broke and many people would be without jobs.
Air flight also enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap air
fare makes it possible for people the world over to travel regularly, regardless of the
purpose of the trip. Therefore, people have the opportunities to learn from different
cultures and have a better understanding of countries they used to be unfamiliar with. This,
in turn, enhances cultural communications between countries.
It is true that air travel consumes oil, but other modes of transportation are also causing
pollution and using fuel. Discouraging private cars and encouraging people to use public
transport could help save the environmental resources in a big way. Therefore it would be a
very unpractical decision to restrict air travel at the cost of people’s mobility, or worse, at
the cost of the development of the economy. Technology could also be used to produce
more environmentally friendly and fuel efficient engines.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, instead of restricting air travel, we should
develop more efficient engine that produces more energy output with less fuel and fewer
major air pollutants. We should also focus on limiting private vehicles and encouraging
public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-04 | Mikul Patel | 73 | view |
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 82
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 67
- Nowadays, many buildings such as offices and schools have open space design instead of separate rooms. Why is it so? What do you think is it a positive or negative effect? 61
- Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... people are employed in this industry. Many businesses like hotels and leisure cent...
^^^^
Line 21, column 69, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e environmental resources in a big way. Therefore it would be a very unpractical decisio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 965.302439024 185% => OK
No of words: 332.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37951807229 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9491997335 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 106.607317073 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 283.868780488 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2725648681 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 24.0 3.83414634146 626% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278882807219 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766763559887 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767490422326 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728678725116 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691418181746 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 40.7170731707 226% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.