In this day and age, laws can change human behavior has become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although, judiciary influencing the general public is regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, there are a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that the effect of the law on society is quite beneficial for nations since it promotes a higher happiness index.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support influence on humanity by the law. First and foremost is that it provides social uplift for the people. Secondly, it helps in less public inequality. From my personal experience, when I visited countries where laws are strict, I have witnessed that the happiness index is much higher. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that humanity can be influenced by law.
However, there is no doubt that laws can provide individuals with various negative outcomes. Despite this possibility, it is highly claimed that within some countries where the law is more strict, there is little or no freedom. By way of example, recent academic research conducted by Oxford University researchers in 2012 has shown that population in such nations consist of less happy people. Thus, it is quite obvious that the impact on society by law can be negative too.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, my opinion confirms that altering human behaviour by rules is good. Not only due to higher happiness index but also due to less public inequality.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 73
- Nowadays, it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balance between work and other aspects of one’s life, such as leisure time with family members. How important do you think is this balance? Why do people find it hard to achieve? 80
- Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 85
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 62
- In the past 100 years, there are many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important invent for the past 100 years? Why? 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ld. Although, judiciary influencing the general public is regarded as thoroughly both positive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98141263941 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72256552047 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 106.607317073 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1985505881 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218141487535 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666387143886 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624322457623 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117434147153 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599507463829 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.