Some people say that computer games are bad for childrenby all means while others believe that these games are contributing to childrens development.
The viven horizontal chart illustrated reveals the information about the children should be playing the video games contributing or not? The data is callibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that the information of the playing video games. They are contributing the indoor games and outdoor games. Children playing the video games is a good. It is a playing the indoor games is a very silence games. Not create the disturbance in the house. It shows the result of survey people conducted by a peraonnel department at a major company.
As for as trend was concerned the many effects the playing in the indoor games.it is a very fatty,laziest ,and so on. Playing the indoor games is a very dangerous in the health. It is very bad effects of the childrens eyesight weak ,and fatty ,and so on.
It is a very good overall,it shows the bad effects o the childrens in the playing games. It is a very weakness in the body .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-26 | Love kaler | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 years and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance 84
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the productionof the silk cloth. 67
- Some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means while others believe that these games are contributing to children's development. 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981 ,1991 and 2001 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , laziest
...g in the indoor games.it is a very fatty,laziest ,and so on. Playing the indoor games is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...indoor games.it is a very fatty,laziest ,and so on. Playing the indoor games is a ve...
^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d effects of the childrens eyesight weak ,and fatty ,and so on. It is a very good...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f the childrens eyesight weak ,and fatty ,and so on. It is a very good overall,it...
^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...y ,and so on. It is a very good overall,it shows the bad effects o the childrens i...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s o the childrens in the playing games. It is a very weakness in the body .
^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...games. It is a very weakness in the body .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63190184049 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76549095355 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472392638037 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1946348932 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.0769230769 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5384615385 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162740960898 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688952266332 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619652906284 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106446806184 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352799575631 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 13.2329268293 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.