Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages?
It is clear that people have a tendency to discard their old or damaged possessions thesedays when they own something new. One of the most controversial issues today relates to Is replacement of old things with new ones give benefits to the owner or not? I am going to examine this question from both points of view.
One side of the argument there are people who argue that the demerits of this considerably outweigh its advantages. The main reason for believing this is that the wastage of electricity, gas and other resources because when there is a rise in the demand due to the more consumtion of the product so, the use of machines will increase for making products that leads to incline in pollution. It is also possible to say that many additional resources are used for production of new things such as plastic, rubber and so on. Most importantly, these elements take long to decompose as a result, these create soil and air pollution.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. People often have this opinion because when individuals use new gadgets besides old ones, they can enhance their knowledge by using new features as well as they can also make their works easy. Hence, society moves forward. A second point is that advance technology can also be helpful for medical sector because if doctors replace their old machines with the latest technical gadgets, it will enable them to find more cures. Therfore, new products can minimise number of incidents such as deaths.
As we have seen that there are number of answers to this question. On balance however, I tend to believe that the possibilities are endless, a person just have to take the initiative and make the change and authorities can also reduce this problem by making new laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | Sandeep kaur12 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Baljitkuar | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | Love kaler | 78 | view |
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 56
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The diagram below shows how the australian bureau of meterology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 56
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 years and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... number of incidents such as deaths. As we have seen that there are number of a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, second, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78317152104 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5446196739 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3671374912 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131844119199 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484715945987 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373612339437 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818725686518 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296522558709 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.