The bar chart below shows the results of the survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 ,and those aged 45-60, shows factors affecting their work performance.
The bar chart show the factor affecting work performance using 2 type groups of workers. The workers aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60.data is celebrated in percentum.
It can be seen that clearly, factor affecting work performance are job security in 20%. On additional to this work environment in 35%. Respectively the workers are job satisfication in 50%.
As per as trend is factor affecting work performance 45-60. The team spirit in 60%. A part from all cgance for personal development in 40%. And then further more realaxed working environment in 25% Respectively.
It us evident that factors affecting work performance are team spirit, chance for personal development and then job security. 20%, 40%,60%,80%and 100% are work performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Mattia95 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Love kaler | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | nikhil dutt | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the productionof the silk cloth. 67
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The circular chart depicts show the main reasons of land degradation.illustrates tbe affected degrated land in three main causes of during in the year of 1990.it can be shows the percentum. 56
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e workers are job satisfication in 50%. As per as trend is factor affecting work p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 633.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 119.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31932773109 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13209860377 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638655462185 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.305264533 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.5454545455 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8181818182 22.9334400587 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282163591619 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104804886698 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100523027593 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191119429265 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15645101511 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.39 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.