The bar chart below shows the results of the survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 ,and those aged 45-60, shows factors affecting their work performance.
The bar chart show the factor affecting work performance using 2 type groups of workers. The workers aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60.data is celebrated in percentum.
It can be seen that clearly, factor affecting work performance are job security in 20%. On additional to this work environment in 35%. Respectively the workers are job satisfication in 50%.
As per as trend is factor affecting work performance 45-60. The team spirit in 60%. A part from all cgance for personal development in 40%. And then further more realaxed working environment in 25% Respectively.
It us evident that factors affecting work performance are team spirit, chance for personal development and then job security. 20%, 40%,60%,80%and 100% are work performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Mattia95 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Love kaler | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | nikhil dutt | 67 | view |
- The pie chart illustrates the information of graph shows the demand for electricity in england during typical days in winter and summer. It shows the average of electricity in england . 56
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 56
- The bar chart below shows the results of the survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 ,and those aged 45-60, shows factors affecting their work performance. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e workers are job satisfication in 50%. As per as trend is factor affecting work p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 633.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 119.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31932773109 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13209860377 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638655462185 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.305264533 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.5454545455 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8181818182 22.9334400587 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282163591619 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104804886698 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100523027593 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191119429265 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15645101511 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.39 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.