The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance
The bar chart represents the results of a survey conducted on two types of workers: people aged 18-30 and those aged 45-60. The survey is about factors affecting work performance.
In workers between 18 and 30 years old the most important factor is the chance for personal development with a percentage of 90%. On the contrary, in the group 45-60 the first factor which affects work performance is money with a percentage of about 70%.
The performance of youngers are more affected than those of elders. It can be related to the fact that young people want more security in job, a better position in work and a relaxed working environment. The elder workers have already reached their perfect work position and they do not need a better job. For these people, the most important factors are the respect from colleagues, the salary and the need of a competent boss.
In conclusion, the factors affecting work performance are different between the two groups, related to the fact that the hope and aspiration are different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Mattia95 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Love kaler | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | nikhil dutt | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of million years 63
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alary and the need of a competent boss. In conclusion, the factors affecting wor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65083987469 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5977486463 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341514386332 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13892327728 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109449983735 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210651440885 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14862030771 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.