The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rently represented. It can be seen that , the work performance factor in team spi...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...urity work performance were 40%.moreover,from 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , job
...re 40%.moreover,from 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,and money in work perform...
^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rom 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,and money in work performance had been 5...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...ly. As far as trend was concerned that,from 18_30age group people work performance ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , job
... group people performance in team spirit,job security, and job satisfaction had been...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 113.0 196.424390244 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03539823009 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2603904387 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.77396925689 2.65546596893 142% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 189.0 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.944676723 43.030603864 262% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.5 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296697511628 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163414487618 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098123649261 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212846852618 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382536316855 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 11.4140731707 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.