The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of worker :those aged from 18_30 and those aged 45_60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance

The given layout chart shows the information about the work performance two age groups by different 10 factors.the data is calibrated in percentum. It is clear and cohrently represented.
It can be seen that , the work performance factor in team spirit 18_30aged group people was 60%.whereas, in age 45_60job security work performance were 40%.moreover,from 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,and money in work performance had been 50%,20%,and 70%respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that,from 18_30age group people work performance in relaxed working environment was 80%.furthermore, in age group 45 _60people in money work performance had 70%.however, in age 45_60age group people performance in team spirit,job security, and job satisfaction had been 60%,20%,and 50% respectively

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-01 Mattia95 78 view
2018-09-04 Mandeepkaur123 56 view
2018-09-04 Mandeepkaur123 56 view
2018-06-28 Love kaler 56 view
2018-06-27 nikhil dutt 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rently represented. It can be seen that , the work performance factor in team spi...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...urity work performance were 40%.moreover,from 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , job
...re 40%.moreover,from 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,and money in work perform...
^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rom 18_30competent boss,job satisfaction ,and money in work performance had been 5...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...ly. As far as trend was concerned that,from 18_30age group people work performance ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , job
... group people performance in team spirit,job security, and job satisfaction had been...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 682.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 113.0 196.424390244 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03539823009 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2603904387 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.77396925689 2.65546596893 142% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 189.0 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.944676723 43.030603864 262% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.5 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296697511628 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163414487618 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098123649261 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212846852618 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382536316855 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 11.4140731707 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.