Some people state that parents have the most essential role in a child’s development. However, others argue that TV or friends are the most significant influence. Discuss both view and state your opinion.
In the developed society, some people believe that TV or friends will give a better education to children than their parents. This essay disagrees with this statement and supports that parents are the best method to instruct children.
On the one hand, it is clear that televisions give people several benefits. But it also brings some disadvantages to people’ children. Begin with the information; children are too small to realize what is good or bad. Moreover, they cannot classify the information they consume. For example, if children turn on the TV and see the program which is not eligible to them, they will copy that because they cannot understand the content of that program. Additionally, their eyes are affected by the blue lights from the screen. If people allow their child to sit in front of the TV screen for a long time, children will suffer from myopia and hyperopia when they mature.
On the contrary, some people assume that parents are the most factors to the development process of a baby. Because they will know what the best is for their children. Parents are the closest person who will train and tutor children until they grow up. For example, the speaking ability of toddlers is quite improved when they hear the parent’s words and imitate it. Furthermore, it is no doubt that the knowledge of parents is not enough to teach children. But it can be solved by the news or information from the Internet. In addition, with the infinity data, the internet is the best assistance to help parents instruct their children.
In conclusion, although TV provides people with much functionality, it may cause some health problems to children. Thus, I personally think that the role of parents is the best contribution to children life.
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make 56
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 61
- In recent years farming practice has changed to include methods such as factory farming and the use of technology to improve crops Some people believe these developments are necessary while others regard them as dangerous and advocate a return to more tra 81
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created a problem that did not exist before.What are the most serious problems associated with the internet what solutions can you suggest 73
- The users of social media like facebook or twitter are replacing face to face contact to this century. Do you think its advantages are outweighed by its disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 5.60731707317 553% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67625728357 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52861952862 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6288252206 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127424142432 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470366399673 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481274684193 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090939057621 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125949737059 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.