The pie charts present the findings of a survey about what British students considered when choosing a tertiary institution in the years of 1982 and 2002.
In both years, university applicants in the UK paid closer attention to suitable courses and degrees than to any other factor. In the past, people regarded tuition costs as the second most crucial reason, while 20 years later, people appreciated the reputation of the institution alternatively.
The availability of suitable courses and degrees was the most important consideration in both years, although the proportion of students who chose this factor dropped from 40% to 34%. Though British people regarded costs as a vital reason while choosing a college in 1982, they gave it little consideration after 20 years. Besides, fewer people considered the location of universities as an important factor, which fell from 19% to 16%.
Different patterns were seen in the changes to the other three factors. Whether the institution is well-known has become a crucial factor over the 20 years, which increased fivefold to a quarter. And the proportion of the factor amenities, social activities, and sports facilities recorded a significant increase from 5% to 18% over the 20 years. However, the proportion of admission criteria remains virtually unchanged from 1982 to 2002 (2% and 3% respectively in these two years).
- The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Surveys conducted in 1982 and 2002 show different pictures of what motivate students to choose a college or university in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31506849315 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91836197145 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579908675799 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5311699734 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109094029191 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459973654578 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050674556541 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802193073513 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571993465132 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.