The bar chart and the table show how people commute in Houston, Texas. It also gives an extra information on CO2 emission from different types of transportation. Furthermore it contains details of traveler’s average age.
As reported almost 48 percent of people commute by their own car and alone. They are nearly 43. Some of whom go to work by cycle or walk are the least and youngest. Obviously this category Do not release any CO2 to environment. The second largest group of people, around 37 percent, travel to work by bus or train. The average age of them is 47. Rest of people go to work by car as the have a company. This category contains 11 percent of people who are 44.
The other important information from the bar chart is amount of CO2 emission, which discuss a little on the lines above. The unit of this parameter is kilogram of released CO2 per person per kilometers. As it shown the most CO2 emission is for car which driven by only one person. from this we can get obviously this amount for cars which contain at least 4 people get less than the car have only one person in it. The third is belong to bus and train.
Based on the explanation, we can conclude that most CO2 emission is from cars in Houston, Texas.
- The given pie charts show data on the population ages in Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and also projected these portions of the population for the year 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wh 67
- In many countries these days the number of people continuing their education after school has increased and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased Do you think this as a positive or negative development 33
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...from different types of transportation. Furthermore it contains details of traveler's ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... category contains 11 percent of people who are 44. The other important information ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...or car which driven by only one person. from this we can get obviously this amount f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ave only one person in it. The third is belong to bus and train. Based on the expla...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, so, third, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49779735683 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52897202614 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546255506608 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5019273312 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.0588235294 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3529411765 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.94117647059 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134212489578 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436957901985 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584026060294 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991628115357 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073890450747 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.