The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one are of Britain. The table show where the money come from and the chart show how it was distributed.
The pie chart and table illustrates the some knowledge related the police budget for two years 2017 and 2018. The former ones show the sources of money and latter ones indicate the expenditures.
Overall, it is clear from the graphs that tabular data show the main four sources of income, while pie chart show the how money sent in three different categories in the Britain.
To analysing data, the police budget indicated sources of income in millions. The maximum income generated through the national government in the both years 175.5 M and 177.8M respectively. The second highest source was local taxes in 2017, it was at 91.2M, but it alleviated almost 10M in 2018. The other source who contributed the less amount in both years were almost same 28M. Whereas, overall income was higher in 2018 ( 318.6M) rather than 2017 (304.7M).
By analysing further data, the pie chart show that how the money was spent in three major fields in the both years. Almost one-third of position spent in salaries for their employees. The less amount spent in technology 8% in 201) and almost double in one year. However, building and transport departments were used same proportion of amount on that years 17% only.
- Some scientists think that computer will soon become more intelligent than humans To what extent do agree or disagree 73
- Traditional museums served as knowledge centre for historical and cultural aspects with the increasing use of internet museums have become obsolete Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below show the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spend doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 76
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 73
- The pie chart shows women in poverty in the USA and bar chart compares poverty rate by age and gender 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...The pie chart and table illustrates the some knowledge related the police budget for...
^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...sources of income, while pie chart show the how money sent in three different categorie...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., but it alleviated almost 10M in 2018. The other source who contributed the less a...
^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...unt in both years were almost same 28M. Whereas, overall income was higher in 2018 318...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ereas, overall income was higher in 2018 318.6M rather than 2017 304.7M. By a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38549276673 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6569751059 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5833333333 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317075418158 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106285985843 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095869537319 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2135429338 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10384031785 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.