The table and charts gives information about a police budget of an area in Britain

Essay topics:

The table and charts gives information about a police budget of an area in Britain.

The table illustrates sources of police budget and pie charts demonstrate key areas of its expenditure, for the years of 2017 and 2018, in a specific area of Britain.
Overall, national government was the biggest contributor to budget in both years, wherein majority of the expenses were on salaries of staff members.
The table shows that there was a minimal increase of roughly 14 million in the police budget, in the course of one year. The largest share was of national government with 175.5 million and 177.8 million in the years of 2017 and 2018 respectively. Whereas, Local taxes accounted for almost one third of total budget, for both the years. Other sources contributed near about 13% in 2017 and just over 12% in 2018.
The pie charts depict distribution of this budget into various sectors. There was a slight decrease of 6% in salaries paid to staff (as it was 75% of the total outlay in 2017, in comparison to 69% of 2018). Meanwhile, expenditure on Technology represented a significant rise of same proportion (by which salaries fell), in the year of 2018 (as it stood at 14% of the total budget, which was 8% in the year 2017). However, Buildings ans Transport were unvaried for both years, remained at 17% of expenses handled.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-26 rishabhk4896@gmail.com 79 view
Essays by user rishabhk4896@g… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, wherein majority of the expenses were on salaries of staff members. The table...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77674418605 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66103425365 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4513624606 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198774967495 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081341489752 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940926573371 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139313856651 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111662498764 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.