The table compares the average living cost per year in three different countries.
Overall, five segments of costing have been listed. While the total living expense in Country A is the highest, Country C encounters the lowest cost for living. In addition, in all the three countries housing and food related expense accounted for more than 60% of total expenditure.
Home rent expenses is the highest in Country A, stands at just under 50%. People have to expense equal amount of costing for food & beverage and leisure items. The expenses of reading book are the lowest, only 3% and other cost involves a total spending of 8%. On the other hand, Food expense in country B is higher than that of Country A, although the expense of living in a home is lower compared to the 1st country. Likewise country A, people need to spend similar percentage of costing for the relaxation, while the cost involves for buying books is under 10%.
On the contrary, the living cost in Country C is quite cheaper among the three countries. However, the food items are the costlier between the listed countries, alternatively the annual spending for house accommodation is the lowest. The costing for purchasing books is more than 20%, whereas people tend to expense a lower percentage of their income for pastime activities. The other expense in country C is the most nominal, 1% only.
- Some believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of the environment Others say it is the government that should take care of the environment Discuss 73
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 78
- Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports Do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...e is lower compared to the 1st country. Likewise country A, people need to spend similar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvolves for buying books is under 10%. On the contrary, the living cost in Coun...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53413455359 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3785886088 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1538461538 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142537967052 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065007592487 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541838049572 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121110256952 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548702246667 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.