Now a days children and teenagers tend to do part time jobs in their leisure time. Many believe that they should engage themselves in benevolent social work not to thinking about too much of money, while other think that it is not essential to involve into social work at the time of their adolescence as it may hamper their core study time. I would argue with the view that a teenager should participate in community work in their free pass time, but they also should be paid as an acknowledgement for their deed as it should play as an encouragement to their good work.
Children are the backbone of the society. A guided generation can guide a nation at the time of their youth. Therefore, it is always a good idea to encourage children to work for their society and eventually for their nation. Firstly, if a child from his or her tender age gets aware of what is good or bad for the society can shape himself or herself in accordance with it. Consequently, it would in return beneficial for both him or her and the society. In addition, they can learn by the experience and later apply it at their maturity. For instance, if a child gets encouraged to participate in a local society blood donation program from his childhood; when they would become young, they would be experienced enough to run the program nationwide. The learning in their childhood may lead them to be confident enough at the letter half of their life.
On the other hand, an aspiration in a form of prize would always be an inspiration for what they are doing for the society. Accordingly, they would feel enthusiast to do such more work in the future. For example, if a child participated in a charitable program got rewarded with a prize bond, it would drive him or her to do take part in another benevolent program where he or she could get another chance to earn a reward for his or her deeds.
In conclusion it can be said that it is better for a child to engage him or herself in various social programs which would be beneficial for both the child and the society. And again, they should be paid either by money or any reward to make themselves more interested to do something for the society.
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 61
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days children and teenagers tend to do part ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... days children and teenagers tend to do part time jobs in their leisure time. Many believ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52525252525 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60097087349 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464646464646 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.397359699 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220766890826 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816837924181 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689450929356 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146612974125 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931022096114 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.