The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates data regarding alteration in the way people travel in England for fifteen years.
Overall, people's preference in the car, long-distance bus, rail, cab and other modes seemed to be ascending with time, however, commuting via bicycle, local bus and walking had a downfall. Among these, a car was mostly used vehicle and bicycle was preferred least.
Regarding all the modes of travelling, inhabitant travelled 3,199 miles on average in the year 1985 which rose sharply to 4,806 in 2000. Similarly, the long-distance bus was mostly liked by people after the car as passengers grew steadily in a later year. Taxi also had an increment of 29 miles in distance travelled by an individual. Train somehow had a slight increase, and other modes also had a rapid inclination in demand which from 450 reached to 585 miles.
On the contrary, the usage of bicycle reduced by 11 miles per person in the year 2000. Likewise, walking had minimal downfall from 255 to 237, but people commuting on the local bus almost reduced to its half (to 274 from 429), in the last year.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 84
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and shows two possible sites for a new supermarket. 73
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world. Do you think that be 73
- The Chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 67
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87567567568 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62047899312 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6218132644 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116537143649 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520606232518 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593712320391 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752481552623 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530614724952 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.