The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The given table below compares the average distances in England travelled by people using different modes of transport over the period of 1985-2000.
Overall, it is clear that the miles travelled by all modes of transport increased significantly over the period. Car was by far the most used mode of travel for English.
According to the table, the distance travelled by car was 3,199 miles in 1985 and rose to 4,806 after 15 years. The miles travelled by long distance bus, train, taxi and other modes of travel also increased during the same period. However, the biggest increase encountered in the distances travelled by taxi per person that rose more than threefold, from 13miles in 1985 to 42 miles in 2000.
By contrast, the average distances travelled by walking, bicycle and local bus declined over the period. The miles travelled by walking and bicycle was 255 and 51 in 1985 and dropped by approximately 10miles in 2000 whereas the figures for local bus saw the biggest declined from 429miles to 275miles between 1985 to 2000.
In total, the average miles travelled per person in UK using all modes of transport escalated from 4740 in1985 to 6475 in 2000.
- The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 75
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010 64
- Nowadays an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 92
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 44
- The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'tables'.
Suggestion: tables
The given table below compares the average distances in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94949494949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51519208113 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489898989899 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8341817827 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283719093369 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134077432697 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779638092997 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181207528589 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759066864412 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.