The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates the land percentage that is covered by forest in four countries namely australia, new Zealand, brazil and chile between 1990 and 2005. In addition, the table shows the projected percentage of the forest land in 2025. Overall, both australia and brazil have decreased percentage during the years, while new Zealand and chile have increased percentages.
In 1990, brazil had the highest percentage of forest land among the four countries at 62.2%. New Zealand had the second percentage at 28.8%, whereas australia and chile had only 21.9% and 20.4% respectively. after 15 years, the percentages had risen up only for new Zealand and chile, with 3% for new Zealand and 1.5% for chile. it is also projected that after 25 years, both countries will still increase their forest lands to 32.3% in the former and 22% in the latter country.
In contrast, australia and brazil had shown downward percentage trends for 15 years. From 21.3% in australia and 62.2% in brazil in the year 1990, it decreased to 21.3% and 57.2% respectively in 2005. The percentages are estimated to fall further to 20% in australia and 53.5% in brazil by 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | vrund_patel97 | 100 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | vrund_patel97 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that it is more important lo plant trees in open areas of towns and cities than to build more housing to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is produced in a nuclear power station 74
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 100
- The chart shows tea and coffee consumption in 2015 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates the land percentage that is covered by forest in four countries namely austr...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... had only 21.9% and 20.4% respectively. after 15 years, the percentages had risen up ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... 3% for new Zealand and 1.5% for chile. it is also projected that after 25 years, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00518134715 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58591272396 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487046632124 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2665787158 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191281641248 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100707524709 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673669925369 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144265160218 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376142628557 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.