The chart shows tea and coffee consumption in 2015.
The diagram illustrates the kilograms of tea and coffee per person consumed in 7 countries Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Russia, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the united states in 2015.
Overall, many countries got more tea consumptions than coffee and the united states had the smallest proportion of tea, accounting for under 1 kilogram.
As surveyed, Canada took a lead in coffee consumption per person with upper 6 kilograms while the USA made up about 5,5 kilograms
and 4 kilograms yet for new Zealand. Meanwhile, there had the same patterns between Australia and the UK, getting exactly 3 kilograms for tea consumption per one. Nevertheless, turkey and Russia made up the least consumption, which took 2 kilograms and 1.5 kilograms respectively.
Easily seemed that turkey reached the largest kilograms of tea consumption with about 5 kilograms per person whilst the UK, Russia, and New Zealand land took a second, third and fourth place for tea consumption in that order. As it can be seen, it only had a little rate, which was not accounting for 1 kilogram yet among Australia Canada and The USA.
In 2015, there was an opposition in Canada and the USA for both sectors, coffee consumption made up of a high rate whereas tea consumption was in small rate per person.
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- The chart shows tea and coffee consumption in 2015 82
- The diagram below shows how electricity is produced in a nuclear power station 74
- Some people think that it is more important lo plant trees in open areas of towns and cities than to build more housing to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, coffee consumption made up of a high rate whereas tea consumption was in smal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98604651163 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78864265421 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5396058895 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231867383946 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125559356308 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087158265625 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154966268001 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642065539997 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.