Given is the data on the percentage of children with different educational issues in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of children experiencing difficulties while studying was higher in "School A" in both years. Besides, the proportion of children with study issues decreased substantially in "School A" as opposed to "School B", where the indicators slightly increased. It is of note that the most common problem areas were concentration in lessons and following instructions, while the fewest children struggled with handwriting and reading.
Regarding the most prevalent problems, in 2005, the number of children failing to concentrate in lessons and follow instructions accounted for 40% and 42% respectively in "School A", whereas in "School B", the indicators totaled 15% and 6% sequentially. Later, for "School A" the figures had soared more than twice by 2015, both numbering 18%, relative to the numbers for "School B", in which the rate for Concentration had not changed, but the ratio of the 'following instructions'' problem had doubled.
In terms of less popular issues, in 2005, the proportions of children with reading and handwriting difficulties comprised 22% and 28% respectively in "School A", which outnumbered the similar percentages of children in "School B" by approximately three times. Although the handwriting index was stable at 28% and 7% sequentially in both primary schools until 2015, the reading issues indicator climbed by a mere 1%.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructions'' or 'instruction's'?
Suggestion: instructions'; instruction's
...changed, but the ratio of the following instructions problem had doubled. In terms of les...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83261802575 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32621071563 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545064377682 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0624685297 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.875 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186437303809 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116417514668 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720619189288 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167599956563 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804459785743 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.13 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.