The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

Given is the data on the percentage of children with different educational issues in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.

Overall, the percentage of children experiencing difficulties while studying was higher in School A in both years, although the proportion of children with study issues decreased substantially in school A as opposed to school B, where the indicators slightly increased. It is of note that the most common problematic areas concerned concentration in lessons and following instructions, while the fewest children struggled with handwriting and reading.

Regarding the most prevalent problems, in 2005, the number of children failing to concentrate in lessons and follow instructions accounted for 40% and 42% respectively in School A, whereas in School B, the indicators totaled 15% and 6% sequentially. By 2015, for School A the figures had soared more than twice, both numbering 18%, relative to the numbers for School B, in which the rate for Concentration had not changed, but the rate of the following instructions problem had doubled.

In terms of less popular issues, in 2005, the proportions of children with reading and handwriting difficulties comprised 22% and 28% respectively in School A, which outnumbered the similar percentages of children in School B by approximately three times. Although the handwriting rate had not experienced any changes in both primary schools by 2015, the reading issues indicator climbed by a mere 1%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...nd 6% sequentially. By 2015, for School A the figures had soared more than twice, bot...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructions'' or 'instruction's'?
Suggestion: instructions'; instruction's
... changed, but the rate of the following instructions problem had doubled. In terms of les...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41739130435 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1864671313 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1015673695 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.0 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250985564348 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136158831905 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076204534471 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18579381928 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717211471016 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...nd 6% sequentially. By 2015, for School A the figures had soared more than twice, bot...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructions'' or 'instruction's'?
Suggestion: instructions'; instruction's
... changed, but the rate of the following instructions problem had doubled. In terms of les...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41739130435 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1864671313 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1015673695 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.0 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250985564348 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136158831905 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076204534471 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18579381928 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717211471016 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.