The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The table illustrates the data about rail transport in the UK, USA, and Italy in the year 2007.

As is presented in the table, Japan had the highest number of people using rail transport excluding metro with 5.9% of total passengers while there was a lower percentage of passengers in America at 0.3%. Meanwhile, the proportion of people utilizing rail transport in Italy and Britain were 5.9 and 5.5 respectively.

In terms of passenger kilometers per head of population, again Japan was in the top list among four countries with 1,980 passengers which is followed by Italy reaching 780 passengers. In contrast to this, America had a least number of passengers at 80. However, the most significant country was America regarding cargo carried which comprised of 2,820 billions tons whereas Italy was the least significant country as it made up 21.9 billions tons cargo.

Overall, the data of Italy and Britain were almost similar in all three category. Likewise, America was higher in number of passenger using rail transport and passenger kilometers per head of population except cargo carried where it was in second position

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ower percentage of passengers in America at 0.3%. Meanwhile, the proportion of pe...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ngers. In contrast to this, America had a least number of passengers at 80. Howev...
^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
...try was America regarding cargo carried which comprised of 2,820 billions tons whereas Italy was t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...l three category. Likewise, America was higher in number of passenger using rail transport and p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, regarding, second, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14054054054 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70229186067 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7208153863 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111707184503 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058286910217 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580311598695 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937304612129 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598306649099 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.