The table compares the various percentages of undergraduate students studying in six fields in a university of Australia in 2011.
It is clear that Australian female students were more likely to study humanities and education in 2011. In contrast, the proportions of pupils who speak languages other than English first and were born outside Australia were lower at the same time.
In majors like humanities, education, science and physics, more than half of the Australian students were females. Among these majors, females tended to like learning humanities most, with 72% students learning it, followed by education, physics and science, at 68%, 56% and 52% respectively. Inversely, the proportions of female students studying information technology and engineering were just 17% and 15% respectively in 2011.
The percentages of students whose mother tongue was not English were less than half in all fields, with the figures for science subjects remaining relatively higher, ranging from 38% to 49% in 2011. Otherwise, the figures for humanities and education were 12% and 16% students respectively in this year.
Foreign students had quite similar proportions with pupils whose mother tongue was not English. The percentages of foreign students in an Australian university in 2011 learning physics and information technology were similar, at 56%, followed by that of engineering and science, at 48%, and 31% respectively. Then again, humanities and education ranked last, only 20% and 23% respectively at the same time.
- Some people believe that they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the average monthly salary and the prices of black and white and colour TV in Japanese yen from 1953 to 1973 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 73
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table compares the various percentag...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in a university of Australia in 2011. It is clear that Australian female stude...
^^^^
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...h first and were born outside Australia were lower at the same time. In majors ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Australia were lower at the same time. In majors like humanities, education, sc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...just 17% and 15% respectively in 2011. The percentages of students whose mother...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6% students respectively in this year. Foreign students had quite similar propo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52340425532 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95539190818 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514893617021 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5384528807 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185983742713 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867546736481 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814765944205 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125910656148 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637040175308 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.