The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Underground Railways Systems
City
Date opened
Kilometres of route
Passengers per year
(in millions)
London
1863
394
775
Paris
1900
199
1191
Tokyo
1927
155
1927
Washington DC
1976
126
144
Kyoto
1981
11
45
Los Angeles
2001
28
50
You should write at least 150 words.
The given table below give data about three feature: date opened, kilometres of route and passengers per year of the in six growth economic cities. Overall, these six countries is very developed with high quality of life and large population and they all use underground as a transport to work.
It can be seen from the table that the time London opened the underground railways systems was the earliest among 6 cities with the most length of route as 394 kilometres. After London is Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC and Kyoto opened this mean of transport with the decline in the kilometres of route. The last country did this thing was Los Angeles in 2001 along with the kilometres of route about 28.
The number of passengers using underground railways systems was different in every countries and it not followed any order. With the most length of route about 394, London had just 775 passengers and in contrast, although the kilometres of route in London is as twice as Tokyo’s, this country had about 1927 passengers. This is the same with other country like Paris and Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Underground Railways SystemsCityDate openedKilometres of rout 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 61
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Underground Railways SystemsCityDate openedKilometres of rout 78
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.https://ieltsonlinetests.com/sites/default/files/2018-06/RAT1- 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'tables'.
Suggestion: tables
The given table below give data about three feature: da...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'feature' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'features'.
Suggestion: features
...given table below give data about three feature: date opened, kilometres of route and p...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'transport'.
Suggestion: transport
...ulation and they all use underground as a transport to work. It can be seen from the tab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86910994764 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54034089669 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1812722847 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178847792628 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832095071018 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064500899268 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132725157914 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283393458239 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.