The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The given table supplies percentages about users spending on various categories in big countries by 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that food\drinks\tobacco category has the highest level while leisure\education section has the least number in all countries.
Now, turning to the details to Ireland it is clearly observed that F\D\T buyers were more than a third whilst shoppers of Clothing\Footwear was 3 times more than consumers of L\E. Looking data of the other two counties, namely Italy and Sweden we recognise that the interests of the food sector numbers were very close (17.77 %-16.36 % respectively), but Italians who choosing clothes were higher number than another country. However, Spanish who interested in free time or learning activities were the lowest rate under a tiny fraction, so the figures for shoes and dresses were nearly 7 % and it was approximately three times less than food sector.
Finally, although turkey was coming in the first place in the meal sector, just over 30 %, while the proportions of the other sections were nearly five times less.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 71
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be tough to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both views and g 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- the graph belo sho s the proportion of the population aged 65 and over bet een 1940 and 2040 n three different countries 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, so, third, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96272905102 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.734104046243 0.547539520022 134% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9661711358 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0606775034782 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405438634978 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656821592707 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683557132195 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082509461497 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.