The table illustrates how peoples in five nations spent their money on three categories of items in 2002. Overall, food/drink/ tobacco consumed the most money from people in these countries in terms of percentage, compared to the other two types.
It is obvious that Turkey was the only one country that had the highest outlay on both food/drink/tobacco and leisure/ education, with 32,14% and 4.35% respectively. In contrast, the percentage of spending on clothing/ footwear (15.77%) and food/drink/tobacco (5.40%) from Swedish individuals were the lowest according to rankings in these items. Despite that, their expenditure on Leisure/ Education was in the second place and just after Turkey by 1.13%. .
Moreover, Leisure/ Education witnessed the percentage of expense from Spain as nearly twice as that from Ireland, with 1.98% and 2.21% respectively. Instead of paying too much on that section, the Irish spent most of their income on Food/ Drink/ tobacco and became a nation ranked the second highest in terms of this item, with 28.91%. Similarly, in accordance with Clothing/ Footwear, 6.63% of outlay from people in Turkey was higher than other countries except for Italy, so it also positioned in the second place of purchasing this item the most.
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 78
- IELTS 4 Test 1 Writing task 1 The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 86
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d place and just after Turkey by 1.13%. . Moreover, Leisure/ Education witness...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, second, similarly, so, except for, in contrast, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88496305117 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.847659534 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14304965924 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683291950173 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719014102564 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112255974135 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786197368758 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.