The table below gives information on households with a regular use of a car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates the number of cars used by per household in Great Britain over a period of 36 years. Overall, it is evident that the percentage of households owning a car was the highest and the figure for households having more than two cars was the lowest from 1971 to 2007.
By 1971, around 45 percent of households possessing a car, whereas only approximately 2 percent of families having more than two cars. The proportion of hoseholds with a regular use of a car fluctuated between 43 and 46 percent throughout a 36-year period. The figure for families owning three or more slightly increase to about 7 percent in 2007.
The percentage of households without a car in 1991 was approximately a half compared to in 1971. This figure significantly declined to around 25 percent in 2007. In contrast, the percentage of two-cars families was just under 10 percent in 1971, but to 2007 it reached about 26 percent.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-06-13 | www.www | 97 | view |
2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 88 | view |
2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 65 | view |
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people believe that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Others however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss both these views and give your o 63
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 67
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory.Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 56
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 55
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both t 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cars was the lowest from 1971 to 2007. By 1971, around 45 percent of households...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y increase to about 7 percent in 2007. The percentage of households without a c...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncrease to about 7 percent in 2007. The percentage of households without a car ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80745341615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83885587131 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9795799681 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289951152582 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131753111727 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648258160501 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211924914315 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726192170594 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.