The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996, 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia

The chart illustrates how many people visited various World Heritage sites in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in travelers to Great Barrier Reef, Blue Mountains, Tasmania Wilderness and Shark Bay, while the rest locations saw a decline in visitors. In addition, Great Barrier Reef consistently had the highest figures throughout the period.
The number of visitors to Great Barrier Reef started at 1,670,000, with a sharp increase to 3,200,000 in the last year. Similar changes, but to a much lesser extent, were seen in 2 places: Blue Mountains and Tasmania Wilderness, which rose gradually from 526,000 and 450,000 in 1996 to 581,000 and 483,000 in 2000, respectively
810,000 people visited Central Eastern and Rainforest Reserve in 1996, with a slow decrease to 770,000 at the end. In addition, the figure for Shark Bay in 1996 was 84,000, after which it saw a fluctuation and reached a peak at 102,000 before declining to 89,000. Similarly, the number of travelers to Macquarie Island was at 350, followed by a slight decline before increasing to 330 in 2000. .

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-09 Bennhehe 84 view
2023-05-03 vuhungbo 84 view
2023-05-03 lnthuyvan 80 view
2022-09-02 Johndavisvu 78 view
2021-10-02 bepmy2992004 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cline before increasing to 330 in 2000. .
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7131066083 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2690551103 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1206256574 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663196664167 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928266765038 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100389949368 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110230402817 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cline before increasing to 330 in 2000. .
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12222222222 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7131066083 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2690551103 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1206256574 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663196664167 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928266765038 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100389949368 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110230402817 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.