The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003.
The table illustrates how many passengers traveled by three major airports in Britain over a five-year period, between 1998 and 2003. The three airports are namely Heathrow, Gatwick, and Stansted.
Overall, it can be seen that there were upward trends in the number of travelers at all three airports. One interesting point is that the largest rise occurred in Gatwick which was also the most popular airport throughout the period.
Looking at the details, as regards Heathrow, it started with 27.2 million travelers. The figure went up steadily and hit a peak at 48.2 in 2000. After that, it fell sharply to 33.2 in 2002, despite increasing sharply to 45.6 in 2003.
If we look at Gatwick, it was the most used airport with 36.5 million travelers in 1998. It witnessed a consistent rise by an average of 3 million in the next 4 years followed by a rocket, reaching nearly 70 million, twice the initial quantity. The trend was also similar for Stansted. Travelers increased gradually from 17.3 million to 26.6 and 39.9 in the first two years. After growing to 43.3 in the following year, the data stayed constant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | hxyav | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | Diana2005 | view | |
| 2021-10-10 | Andino0226 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | phamkhuyen | 72 | view |
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 78
- The diagram below shows how rocks are created and destroyed in the rock cycle 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89005235602 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52172382185 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664921465969 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1803727276 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245502182855 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079103852923 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999061647298 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150170911829 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12417205861 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.