Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.
Nowadays, some young people can be seen doing part-time volunteering jobs when they are free. Personally, I think it should be a must practice because it fosters positive results for both young people themselves and society as a whole.
On the one hand, participating in unpaid work for the local community can be advantageous for teenagers’ personal lives. Firstly, the young can interact with new people, expand their network and improve their communication skills. They may also get ready for real workforce as volunteering involves elements of professional work like regulating tasks, facilitating with co-workers, and managing the time. Since it is a win-win situation for all; teenagers get to learn new skills, residents promote union and neighborhoods have better facilities. The final reason for believing this is that universities and colleges today prioritize prospective students who have joined social clubs and volunteering groups.
By contrast, there are reasons why elders should not make social work compulsory for teenagers. Young students are already under enough pressure with their studies, so they have very limited time and energy for any extra effort. For example, teachers expect them to turn in homework every day, take tutorials and consolidate for exams in each academic year. Therefore, they should be set free to manage their own leisure time, maybe chatting with friends and doing stimulating hobbies. Finally, forcing a group of people what to do strictly cannot lead to a fair society and children will start feeling they are being used.
In conclusion, teenagers can broaden their horizons, learn new things, and also benefit the community by volunteering. Hence, I believe they should be motivated to perform it in their free time regularly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-04 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
2023-09-04 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
2023-08-31 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
2023-08-31 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
2023-08-23 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane
- Some people think the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...form it in their free time regularly.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, may, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81745053508 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.121292144 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35447267141 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118479466523 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744602607709 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227470277511 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054046688982 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.