The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992, 2002, 2012
The table gives data on the amount of food consumed per person weekly in a particular European country in three years (1992, 2002 and 2012).
Overall, the largest part of people’s meals was made up of vegetables while cheese made up the smallest part of people’s diet. It is also worth noting that over the given period, the trends remained the same.
The highest portion of people’s food intake was the number of vegetables consumed at 2140 grams, followed by the amount of meat consumed at 1148 grams. The consumption of vegetables rose slightly over the years and reaching 2220 grams in 2012. The proportion of meat saw a small increase of more than 60 grams in 2002 before dropping back to 1132 grams in 2012.
The rest of the food intake included wheat, beans, and cheese at 937 grams, 532 grams, and 113 grams respectively in 1992. Despite the unchanged amount of cheese in the next 20 years period, the figures for wheat and beans grew up to reach 977 grams and 590 grams respectively in 2012.
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer so people tend to go to stores in the towns and cities and then lead to their inconvenient life Car use also causes pollution Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and the present day 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... years and reaching 2220 grams in 2012. The proportion of meat saw a small increase...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ropping back to 1132 grams in 2012. The rest of the food intake included wheat,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70786516854 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36492165569 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2380925374 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215040024762 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101424538298 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159089370383 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168931930095 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201974288236 0.0819641961636 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.