The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014
The given table provides the information about the manufacture of oil on a daily basis in 4 different nations between 2010 and 2014.
As can be seen from the table, almost all countries witnessed increases in the production of oil, except for that of country C during the 4-year period. Specifically, country C held the highest figure from 2010 to 2013, but it dropped to the second position on the list in 2014.
In 2010, country C took the first place in oil production at 175,000, followed by that of country A, at 105,000. While there was a significant decrease in Country C’s oil quantities of more than 70,000, Country A surpassed other countries and led in oil production at 113,000 at the end of the period shown.
On the other hand, country B registered no data in the first 3 years. However, the oil output in this country suddenly went up to 8,000 before growing more than five-fold to reach 50,000 in 2014. Similarly, although the oil volume of country D rose considerably by 40,000, this was the country generating the lowest oil amount at the end of the period in comparison with other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 84
- The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64999823187 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6813908747 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385756844381 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178480251168 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634912914277 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246110721935 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513378058631 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.