The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides statistics about income per capita, population by age and under the poverty line of three states in the USA, including California, Utah and Florida
Overall, while Florida had the oldest population Utah was on the contrary. Although the salary per capita in California was the highest, this state also registered the biggest percentage of population under the poverty line
The country that had the youngest population was Utah, with 28% of its population being people under 18. Meanwhile, the rates of young people in California and Florida were almost the same, with 17% and 16%, respectively. However, there was about one-fourth of elders over 60 in Florida, accounting for the largest proportion among the three states. In addition, the old population in Utah and California was relatively low with 8% and 13%, respectively
In California, an average person was expected to generate about 23,000$ average, the highest among all three states. People living in Florida earned a comparable figure with 32,000$ per capita, higher than that of Utah 5,000$. Although residents living in California had the highest annual income per person, it had the highest rate of the population living below the poverty line, with 16%, nearly doubling that of Utah with the lowest rate of 9%. Finally, the poverty rate in Florida was 12%
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Task 2 Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of population under the poverty line The country that had the youngest popula...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...erson was expected to generate about 23,000$ average, the highest among all three st...
^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...rida earned a comparable figure with 32,000$ per capita, higher than that of Utah 5,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
... per capita, higher than that of Utah 5,000$. Although residents living in Californi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20642201835 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60256731321 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1196579245 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.875 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185652736197 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850941597553 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703596880492 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151890715144 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907443118813 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.