The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. (Actual Test in July 2020)
The table shows the proportion of people aged 65 and over in Canada, Germany, and the UK between 1988 and 2000, and the projections for 2030.
Overall, it is obvious that the percentage of the German population aged 65 and above was the highest over the period. Furthermore, the figure for those of 2000 in all the countries mentioned had experienced an upward trend and continued increase in 2030.
In 1988, the proportion of German citizens aged 65 and over was 20%, compared to 16% of Canadians and 14% of British residents. A similar pattern was observed in 2000 owing to the proportion of the population aged 65 and above in all three countries witnessing marginal growth. In particular, Germany's population rate reached the highest position at 25%, followed by Canada and the UK at 21% and 15%, respectively.
The predicted year 2030 was considered that the percentage of the German population expressed a gradual increase of 5%. The second highest, in Canada, was only lower than that in Germany 4%. At the same time, the proportion of people in the United Kingdom was consistently in last place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-22 | vananhxh2005 | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting aand reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows information regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries Actual Test in July 2020 56
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, second, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92021276596 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78399905656 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3523731842 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203015651502 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887241833847 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782705343643 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129307083022 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392487305529 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, second, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92021276596 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78399905656 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3523731842 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203015651502 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887241833847 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782705343643 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129307083022 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392487305529 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.