The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009.
The table compares three different countries, namely Argentina, Australia and Thailand, in terms of car production over the course of 6 years starting from 2003.
Generally, Thailand produced the largest number of cars over the period shown. On the other hand, while the amount of automobile made in Argentia and Thailand increased, the opposite was true for Australia.
As can be seen from the table, in 2003, Thailand being nation led in car producing with 735,852 vehicles, significantly more than in Australia, with just over 450,000 cars, whereas the amount of car in Argentia was only a third of Thailand and half of Australia.
Over the ensuing six years, Thailand still remained the first rank in car manufacturing among the three territories. Their car production increased strongly and reached a peak of 1,162,356 cars before dropping down to nearly one million in 2009. The upward trend can be seen at Argentia, the quantity of car manufactured in Argentia rose throughout the period to 466,089, which made them become the second biggest manufacturer of cars in the last year. Likewise, the figure for Australia experienced a downward tendency also appeared, decreasing to under 250,000 automobiles at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view | |
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view | |
| 2020-02-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | HaiTrieuIELTS | 95 | view |
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 78
- The given bar graphs show the extent of cash that individuals in France, Germany and England spent on nourishment and different items in 1998 and 2008. 73
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 72
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.205 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79960265038 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7178683028 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348448389401 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143618184693 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829356679067 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224075726608 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591441709845 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.205 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79960265038 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7178683028 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348448389401 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143618184693 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829356679067 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224075726608 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591441709845 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.