The presented table compares three distinct nations in terms of their car manufacture capabilities between 2003 and 2009.
Overall, it is evident that car production in Thailand ranked first among three categories in all years. In addition, despite considerable modifications, the numbers of automobiles manufactured by all countries were always kept higher than 200000 over the period.
Turning into detail, there were 700000 cars produced by Thai factories in 2003. Two years later, the figure grew significantly to reach the peak of 1119000 vehicles, before slightly decreasing to 999000 in 2009. However, in spite of this decline, Thailand still maintained its largest automobile production capacity, compared to two remaining countries.
Regarding to other nations, in comparison to Australia, the number of cars of which was only 200000, car manufacture capability of Argentina was two times higher in 2003. Nevertheless, over the next two years, while cars made in Australia doubled to 400000, those of Argentina displayed an opposite trend, which dropped dramatically to 200000. Throughout the remainders of the period, the figure for Australia was kept increasing dramatically to 600000, in contrast to that of Argentina, which fell to 161000 cars.
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on 89
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Argentina, which fell to 161000 cars.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64397905759 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98757970957 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659685863874 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8872901265 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151891864443 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641900018609 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601751066299 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984210222655 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461602591505 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.